Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Evanthia Lalla, Ira B. Lamster, Michael Feit, Linda Huang, Alexandra Spessot, Wu Qu, Thomas Kislinger, Yan Lu, David M. Stern, Ann Marie Schmidt
Published in Volume 105, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(8):1117–1124 doi:10.1172/JCI8942
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Immunoblotting for RAGE (a) and EN-RAGEs (b) and immunohistochemistry for AGEs (ch). At sacrifice, gingival tissue was removed and was either prepared for immunoblotting as described above or fixed in buffered formalin (10%). Paraffin-embedded sections, 5 μm thick, were prepared for immunohistochemistry. Immunoblotting was performed with rabbit anti-murine RAGE IgG (4.5 μg/mL) or rabbit anti–EN-RAGE IgG (2 μg/mL) as above. Molecular weight markers (kDa) are indicated on the right side of the immunoblot. Immunohistochemistry is shown for a representative section from a diabetic MSA-treated mouse using nonimmune rabbit IgG (1 μg/mL in c) or affinity-purified anti-AGE IgG (1 μg/mL in dg). Samples are as follows: non-diabetes/MSA, d; diabetes/MSA, e; diabetes/sRAGE(–), f; and diabetes/sRAGE(+), g. Scale bar: 45 μm. In h, the results of quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemistry, performed as described above, are shown.