Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yoichi Miyazaki, Keisuke Oshima, Agnes Fogo, Brigid L.M. Hogan, Iekuni Ichikawa
Published in Volume 105, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(7):863–873 doi:10.1172/JCI8256
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6

Ectopia of UV orifice in Bmp4+/– mutants. All the panels are from E16.5 wild-type (a, d, and f) and heterozygous mutant (b, c, e, and g–i) embryos. (a–c) Gross morphology of the urogenital system is shown. Hydroureter is already present in E16.5 mutant embryos (b and c). (d and e) Macroscopic appearance of the UV orifice inside the bladder. The position of the UV orifice (arrows) is abnormally close to the orifice of the urethra (arrowheads) in the mutant (e). (f and g) Microscopic appearance of the UV orifice. The distance between the left and right orifices (asterisk) is short in the mutant (g), when compared with the wild-type (f). (h and i) Adjacent transverse sections of the urogenital tract from 1 mutant embryo. The left ureter changes direction posteriorly at the site indicated by the asterisk in h and connects to the left seminar vesicle, as indicated by the asterisk in i. B, bladder; Ut, ureter; SV, seminal vesicle. L, left; R, right. Bar, 1 mm (a–c); 200 μm (d and e); 100 μm (f-i).