Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yoichi Miyazaki, Keisuke Oshima, Agnes Fogo, Brigid L.M. Hogan, Iekuni Ichikawa
Published in Volume 105, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(7):863–873 doi:10.1172/JCI8256
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

The ontogeny of hypo/dysplastic kidney in Bmp4+/– embryos. (a) Gross appearance of E14.5 kidneys of wild-type (left) and heterozygous mutant (right) embryos. The mutant kidney is distinctively small. (b and c) Sagittal sections of the wild-type (b) and mutant (c) kidneys. The number of nephrogenic components per kidney is depressed in mutants. (d) Pax2 whole-mount in situ hybridization of E12.5 wild-type (left) and mutant (right) kidneys. The condensed mesenchyme is abnormally low in number in mutants. (e) c-ret whole-mount in situ hybridization of E11.5 wild-type (left) and mutant (right) kidneys. The first branch stems (arrows) and the main ureter trunk (between arrowheads) are short in mutants. The size of ureter buds is also smaller in mutants. Ut, main stem of the ureter; WD, Wolffian duct. Bar, 300 μm. (f) The number of condensed mesenchyme per kidney from wild-type (n = 10) and mutant embryos (n = 10) at E12.5 was quantitated. The number is significantly lower in mutant kidneys (P < 0.01 vs. wild-type kidneys). (g) The length of main stem of the ureter was measured in wild-type (n = 14) and heterozygous mutant (n = 16) E11.5 embryos. The difference is statistically significant by Student’s t test (P < 0.001).