Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yoichi Miyazaki, Keisuke Oshima, Agnes Fogo, Brigid L.M. Hogan, Iekuni Ichikawa
Published in Volume 105, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(7):863–873 doi:10.1172/JCI8256
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Gross anatomy and light microscopic histology of the congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract found in Bmp4+/– pups at P0. (ad) Gross appearance of the kidney and urinary tract system from wild-type (a) and Bmp4+/– (bd) mice at P0. (b) HK/DKs. (c) Hydronephrosis with hydroureter with marked tortuosity (arrows). (d) Bifid ureters, in which the 2 ureters (arrowheads) from the duplex kidney unite caudally to form a single ureter that drains into the bladder with 1 ureteral orifice. An arrow indicates the site where the 2 ureters join. (eg) Sagittal sections of the kidneys from wild-type (e) and Bmp4+/– (f and g) mice are shown. (f) Hydronephrosis with thinning of renal parenchyma. (g) Hypoplastic kidney (right in b) with “cystic dysplastic” regions that are devoid of nephrogenic components, but are filled with cysts and stromal mesenchymal cells. Bar, 1.2 mm (ad); 0.4 mm (eg). (h) The volume of wild-type and heterozygous mutant kidneys was compared. The data are from 27 (wild-type, 14; Bmp4+/–, 13) kidneys of 2 litters, with obvious hydronephrotic kidneys excluded. Mean values and SEMs from each group are also shown. The difference is statistically significant by Student’s t test (P < 0.01).