Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
R. Wiest, S. Das, G. Cadelina, G. Garcia-Tsao, S. Milstien, R.J. Groszmann
Published in Volume 104, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(9):1223–1233 doi:10.1172/JCI7458
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1

(a) Perfusion pressure under basal conditions (Base) and during the administration of 30 μM and 100 μM MTx in the in vitro–perfused superior mesenteric arterial bed. *P < 0.01 vs. control. **P < 0.0001 vs. control. #P < 0.01 vs. LC, BT. (ANOVA for pressure-response periods: P < 0.0001 for control vs. LC, BT or LC, BT+ rats; P < 0.01 for LC, BT+ vs. LC, BT rats.) (b) Relationship between in vitro vascular responsiveness and systemic hemodynamic parameter MAP. A close correlation for in vitro pressure response to MTx (100 μM) and in vivo MAP was observed (r = 0.797, P < 0.0001).