Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Mitsuru Horiba, Kenji Kadomatsu, Eishin Nakamura, Hisako Muramatsu, Shinya Ikematsu, Sadatoshi Sakuma, Kenji Hayashi, Yukio Yuzawa, Seiichi Matsuo, Masafumi Kuzuya, Tadashi Kaname, Makoto Hirai, Hidehiko Saito, Takashi Muramatsu
Published in Volume 105, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 2000; 105(4):489–495 doi:10.1172/JCI7208
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4

Morphometric analysis of neointima formation. (a and b) Comparison between Mdk+/+ and Mdk–/– mice; (c) comparison between Mdk–/– mice treated with either saline, albumin, or MK protein. (a) The mean ratios between the areas of the intimal lesion and the media (IL/M) and standard deviations for Mdk+/+ and Mdk–/–. The difference between Mdk+/+ and Mdk–/– mice was statistically significant (P < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test). (b) Circumferences of the external elastic lamina (EEL) and lumen (Lumen). The circumference of the lumen was significantly different between Mdk+/+ and Mdk–/– mice (P < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test). In all plots, the open columns indicate Mdk+/+ mice, and the filled columns indicate Mdk–/–. NS, not significant. (c) The mean ratios (IL/M) and standard deviations for Mdk–/– mice treated with saline, human albumin, or MK. The open column indicates mice treated with MK; the gray column indicates mice treated with human albumin; and the filled column indicates mice treated with saline. The difference between the MK-treated group and those treated with human albumin or saline was statistically significant (P < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test).