Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Raija L.P. Lindberg, Rudolf Martini, Matthias Baumgartner, Beat Erne, Jacques Borg, Jürgen Zielasek, Kenneth Ricker, Andreas Steck, Klaus V. Toyka, Urs A. Meyer
Published in Volume 103, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 1999; 103(8):1127–1134 doi:10.1172/JCI5986
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

Neurophysiological abnormalities in PBGD–/– mice. (a) CMAP recordings from the foot muscles after proximal stimulation of the sciatic nerve. Note the different amplitude scales. PBGD–/– mouse and control were 16 months old. A decrease of the M-response amplitude and temporal dispersion can be seen in the PBGD–/– mouse. The arrow denotes the onset of the M-response, and F represents F-wave. Redrawn from original recordings. (b) Polyphasic MUAP recorded in the greater gluteal muscle of a PBGD–/– mouse. (c) Representative electromyography recordings from a PBGD–/– mouse (upper traces) and a control mouse (lower traces) during maximal withdrawal. Note the dense interference pattern in the control mouse, which was not achieved by the PBGD–/– mouse, and the higher MUAP amplitudes in the PBGD–/– mouse.