Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hugues Abriel, Johannes Loffing, John F. Rebhun, J. Howard Pratt, Laurent Schild, Jean-Daniel Horisberger, Daniela Rotin, Olivier Staub
Published in Volume 103, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 1999; 103(5):667–673 doi:10.1172/JCI5713
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Dose–response relationship of the effect of Nedd4 on ENaC activity. (a) Immunoblot analysis showing expression of xNedd4 with increasing amounts of xNedd4 cRNA (ng/oocyte). (b) Corresponding normalized INa. The measured currents were normalized to control oocytes (6.1 ± 2.3 μA/oocyte). n = 16–18 oocytes from three different batches. **P < 0.01 vs. ENaC/H2O–injected oocytes (i.e., 0 ng of xNedd4 cRNA). The difference in INa in oocytes injected with 0 and 0.2 ng cRNA/oocyte was not statistically significant.