Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Pat Rabjohn, Erica M. Helm, J. Steven Stanley, C. Michael West, Hugh A. Sampson, A. Wesley Burks, Gary A. Bannon
Published in Volume 103, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 1999; 103(4):535–542 doi:10.1172/JCI5349
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Bacterial expression and immunoblot analysis of recombinant Ara h 3. (a) 10-μl samples of bacterial extract were electrophoresed in a 12% Tris-glycine gel. Proteins were visualized by Coomassie blue staining. Lane A, 4-h induction of vector containing no insert; lane B, uninduced Ara h 3 (vector with inset); lane C, 1-h induction; lane D, 2-h induction; lane E, 3-h induction; lane F, 4-h induction. (b) Immunoblot of a with a pool of patient serum as described in Methods. (c) Immunoblot of purified recombinant Ara h 3 with serum IgE from individual patients (lanes A–R were patients with documented peanut hypersensitivity) and a pool of serum IgE from peanut-hypersensitive patients (lane S). A nonallergic patient with elevated serum IgE served as a negative control (lane T).