Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Valéry Combes, Anne-Christine Simon, Georges-Emile Grau, Dominique Arnoux, Laurence Camoin, Florence Sabatier, Murielle Mutin, Marielle Sanmarco, José Sampol, Françoise Dignat-George
Published in Volume 104, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(1):93–102 doi:10.1172/JCI4985
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1

Flow cytometric quantitation of EMPs. MPs (Gate A) were discriminated by size on an FSC/SSC cytogram (a). Only events included within gate A were further analyzed for fluorescence associated with irrelevant (b) and specific (c) labeling. Gate A was defined by excluding the first FSC channel that contained most of the background noise and by using 0.8-μm latex beads. The gate was defined to include the beads in its upper 33%. In this example EMP quantitation was done using FITC-annexin V labeling, and EDTA buffer was used as a negative control. (a) Determination of forward scatter (FSC) and side-scatter (SSC) characteristics of MPs in suspension. A similar approach was used to analyze MPs in platelet-free plasma. The 2 gates represent the pattern of 0.8- and 3-μm latex beads (A and B, respectively). (b) Determination of the limit for negative fluorescence, performed in the presence of EDTA as a negative control for annexin V. (c) Detection of PS on MPs through annexin V-FITC binding (FL1), expressed in relation to structure (SSC).