Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
S.A. Litherland, X.T. Xie, A.D. Hutson, C. Wasserfall, D.S. Whittaker, J.-X. She, A. Hofig, M.A. Dennis, K. Fuller, R. Cook, D. Schatz, L.L. Moldawer, M.J. Clare-Salzler
Published in Volume 104, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(4):515–523 doi:10.1172/JCI4852
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2

Percentage of CD14+ monocytes expressing PGS2 is significantly higher in subjects at risk for IDDM compared with controls. Data from blood samples taken from subjects at risk for IDDM, relatives, and controls. The first 3 data sets (Controls, Relatives, All Subjects) are data taken from all participants in the study. “All Subjects” data are divided into groups based on risk (i.e., low-, moderate-, and high-risk IDDM subgroups; established diabetics [IDDM]; and ICA+ individuals with clinically established AI). The percentages of PGS2+/CD14+ monocytes from relatives and all subjects were significantly different from the normal control group, as assessed by weighted Tobit analysis (P = 0.004). Solid lines indicate group means; the dotted line represents the control group mean plus 2 SDs, the level used to define high-level PGS2 expression (9.9%).