Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Dallas Jones, Laurie H. Glimcher, Antonios O. Aliprantis
Published in Volume 121, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2011; 121(7):2534–2542 doi:10.1172/JCI46262
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Jci46262
Figure 2
Potential roles of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in host defense against bacterial pathogens.

(A) TLR ligands have multiple effects on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, eliciting responses that modulate inflammation and immunity, promote bacterial killing, and shift the balance of bone remodeling toward resorption. (B) Infection of osteoblasts with S. aureus may provide the bacteria with a niche to avoid antibiotics and antibacterial responses and promote bone destruction through TRAIL, which can sequester OPG and induce osteoblast apoptosis. (C) A potential mechanism for bisphosphonate ONJ. A septic insult to bone such as a tooth extraction results in necrosis. Normally the necrotic bone is removed by osteoclasts. When osteoclast activity is blocked by bisphosphonates, bacteria produce biofilms on the necrotic tissue allowing them to evade host defense mechanisms.