Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Richard J. Stanton, Katarina Baluchova, Derrick J. Dargan, Charles Cunningham, Orla Sheehy, Sepehr Seirafian, Brian P. McSharry, M. Lynne Neale, James A. Davies, Peter Tomasec, Andrew J. Davison, Gavin W.G. Wilkinson
Published in Volume 120, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(9):3191–3208 doi:10.1172/JCI42955
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 9
Repression of UL128L and RL13 by BAC-derived viruses in HFFF-tet cells.

(A) FACS analysis of parental HFFFs or HFFF-tet cells, infected with empty control adenovirus (RAd-Ctrl) or RAd-expressing eGFP (RAd-GFP). RAd-GFP expresses GFP from the HCMV MIE promoter, containing 2 tet operators 10 bp downstream of the TATA box. (BE) Plaque sizes of viruses generated at 2 weeks PT in HFFFs (B and D) or HFFF-tet cells (C and E), with cells overlaid to prevent cell-free spread of virus, showing (B and C) repression of UL128L in RCMV1393 and (D and E) repression of RL13 in RCMV1448. (F) Titers of virus stocks obtained from HFFF-tet cells infected with viruses in which RL13 and UL131A were tet controlled (RCMV1448 and RCMV1393, respectively) or the parental viruses in which RL13 and UL131A were not tet controlled (RCMV1159 and RCMV1160, respectively). (G) Plaque size of parental virus (RCMV1160) or virus in which UL131A was tet controlled (RCMV1393) in ARPE19 cells, 3 weeks PT.