Log In


Create account or
Reset password
Subscription options
  • Purchase this article...
  • Price: $5
    Purchasing this article will give you full access for the calendar year.
  • Purchase Site Pass...
  • Price: $10
    This will give you access to every article on the site for 24 hours.
  • Online subscription...
  • Price: $95
    Individual online subscriptions give you full online access for the calendar year.
  • Print subscription...
  • Price: $250*
    Individual print subscriptions give you the print journal and full online access for the year.
    *Price outside U.S. and Canada: $475.
Continue reading with a subscription.
A subscription is required for you to read this article in full. If you are a subscriber, you may log in to continue reading.
If you are at an institution or library and believe you should have access, please check with your librarian or administrator (more information).
Problems? Please try these troubleshooting tips.

Commentary

Putting the brakes on BTLA in T cell–mediated cancer immunotherapy

Chrystal M. Paulos, Carl H. June

Published January 4, 2010

Attenuating coinhibitory molecules for the treatment of cancer is gaining a great deal of attention as a strategy for immunotherapy. The B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA, CD272) is a novel coinhibitory molecule structurally and functionally related to CTLA-4 and PD-1. A study in this issue of the JCI by Derré et al. reveals that BTLA is expressed on virus-specific human CD8+ T cells but is progressively downregulated after their differentiation from a naive to effector phenotype (see the related article beginning on page 157). Surprisingly, tumor-specific human CD8+ T cells continue to express BTLA even after their differentiation to an effector phenotype. Remarkably, vaccination of melanoma patients with CpG led to BTLA downregulation on tumor-specific human CD8+ T cells, concomitant with restoration of their functionality. We discuss these findings in the context of the expanding field of cosignaling molecules and their implications for T cell–based therapies for cancer.

Preview pages

Reset
Page preview
77 Page 76 Back