Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Marie-Therese Rached, Aruna Kode, Barbara C. Silva, Dae Young Jung, Susan Gray, Helena Ong, Ji-Hye Paik, Ronald A. DePinho, Jason K. Kim, Gerard Karsenty, Stavroula Kousteni
Published in Volume 120, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(1):357–368 doi:10.1172/JCI39901
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7
Foxo1 deletion in osteoblasts protects from HFD-induced obesity.

(A and B) Body weight curve (A) and MRI analysis of fat content (B) of WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice on normal or high-fat diet; n = 5 mice/group. Basal is considered 1 and is the fat content of each experimental group at 0 weeks, i.e., before the onset of HFD. (C) Perigonadal fat pad weight in WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice on normal or high-fat diet; n = 5 mice/group. (D and E) ITT (D) and GTT (E) analysis in WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice on normal or high-fat diet; n = 5 mice/group. CD, normal control diet. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test. In C, letters above the bars denote significant differences, where b is different from a; c is different from a and b; and a,b is different from c. In AC, mice were 1 month old when placed on HFD. In D and E, mice were 3 months of age.