Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Marie-Therese Rached, Aruna Kode, Barbara C. Silva, Dae Young Jung, Susan Gray, Helena Ong, Ji-Hye Paik, Ronald A. DePinho, Jason K. Kim, Gerard Karsenty, Stavroula Kousteni
Published in Volume 120, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(1):357–368 doi:10.1172/JCI39901
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Increased insulin sensitivity in Foxo1ob–/– mice.

(A) ITTs in WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice; n = 5 mice/group. (Identical data are shown in Figure 5E.) (B) Glucose infusion rate (GIR) and suppression of hepatic glucose production (HGP) (% of clamp HGP relative to basal HGP) in WT (n = 3) and Foxo1ob–/– (n = 5) mice by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. (C) Real-time PCR analysis of insulin target gene expression in skeletal muscle of WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice. Values are expressed as fold increase relative to WT; n = 4 mice/group. (D and E) HPLC analysis of adenine nucleotide levels in the vastus lateralis muscle; n = 4 mice/group. (F) Real-time PCR analysis of insulin target genes in the liver of WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice; n = 4 mice/group. (G) Oil red O staining in liver sections of WT and Foxo1ob–/– mice; n = 4 mice/group. Scale bars: 100 μm. In all panels, data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test. All mice were 2–3 months of age.