Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Takayuki Shiratsuchi, Urvashi Rai, Anja Krause, Stefan Worgall, Moriya Tsuji
Published in Volume 120, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(10):3688–3701 doi:10.1172/JCI39812
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 11
Effect of preexisting anti-Ad immunity on the induction of anti-(QGPGAP)3 antibody response by capsid-modified rAds and on their in vitro infectivity.

(A) Immunization regimen. BALB/c mice were first immunized intramuscularly with 1010 v.p. WT/Empty at weeks 0 and 3, followed by immunization of 1010 v.p. capsid-modified rAd at weeks 6 and 8. Titers of anti-(QGPGAP)3 antibody were measured by ELISA at week 10. (B) Anti-(QGPGAP)3 antibody titers in rAd-immunized mice preimmunized with WT/Empty at weeks 0 and 3. One-way ANOVA, followed by a Dunnett’s test, was used to determine the differences between the group immunized with WT/CS-GFP and each of the other groups immunized with capsid-modified rAd. Horizontal bars represent the geometric mean. (C) In vitro neutralization of capsid-modified rAd by serum from mice immunized with various rAds. Mouse sera were prepared from BALB/c mice (10 mice in each group) immunized twice with 1 × 109 v.p. WT/GFP, WT/CS-GFP, or B-HVR1/B-Fib/CS-GFP. These sera were pooled in each group, and neutralizing activity was evaluated as described in Figure 9.