Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hiroyuki Nakayama, Ilona Bodi, Robert N. Correll, Xiongwen Chen, John Lorenz, Steven R. Houser, Jeffrey Robbins, Arnold Schwartz, Jeffery D. Molkentin
Published in Volume 119, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(12):3787–3796 doi:10.1172/JCI39724
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5
Restoration of α1G in cardiomyocytes suppresses the pathologic phenotype of α1G–/– mice.

(A) HW/BW of α1G DTG (line 9.4) or control (WT and tTA) mice in the α1G–/– or α1G+/+ background 2 weeks after a sham or TAC procedure. (B) Histological analysis of myocyte cross-sectional areas from ventricles of α1G DTG (line 9.4) or control (Con.; WT and tTA) mice in the α1G–/– background 2 weeks after TAC. (C) Western blot analysis of α1G protein expression from α1G DTG (line 9.4) mice in the α1G–/– or α1G+/+ backgrounds at 3 months of age. α-Tub, α-tubulin. (D) Fractional shortening assessment by echocardiography from mice as in A. The number of mice analyzed in each group is shown within the bars. *P < 0.05 versus sham; #P < 0.05 versus control TAC in the α1G+/+ background; P < 0.05 versus control TAC in the α1G+/+ background; P < 0.05 versus control TAC in the α1G–/– background.