Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Demetri J. Merianos, Eleonor Tiblad, Matthew T. Santore, Carlyn A. Todorow, Pablo Laje, Masayuki Endo, Philip W. Zoltick, Alan W. Flake
Published in Volume 119, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(9):2590–2600 doi:10.1172/JCI38979
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Jci38979
Figure 10
Treg suppression assay.

(A) CD4+CD25+ Tregs and CD4+CD25 effector T cells were sorted. (B and C) Controls consisted of (B) unstimulated and (C) stimulated effector T cells. (D and E) Suppression was measured after a 1:1 addition of (D) non-chimeric and (E) chimeric Tregs. Each histogram is representative of at least 5 independent experiments. (F) The percentage suppression at a 1:1 Treg/effector T cell ratio. Data are mean ± SEM.