Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Mary Abigail S. Garcia, Ning Yang, Paul M. Quinton
Published in Volume 119, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(9):2613–2622 doi:10.1172/JCI38662
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 12
Assay validation for mucus content.

A set of 8 sequential perfusates from each of a pair of intestinal segments was collected and assayed by 4 different methods for mucins. One segment was bathed in HCO3- containing (2.5 × 10–2 M) and the other in HCO3-free Ringer. Upper panel: results of assays on perfusate samples from the intestinal segment bathed in HCO3-buffered Ringer and stimulated with PGE2 after collecting perfusate sample no. 4. Lower panel: same as upper panel except the segment was incubated in the absence of HCO3. Assays: PAS OD (diamonds): soluble PAS-positive material in liquid samples; PAS dot blot (circles): filtrands assayed for PAS-positive material retained on the Immobilon membrane; WGA-HRP (triangles): filtrands assayed for lectin-binding carbohydrates with HRP-tagged WGA lectin; Muc2 antibody (squares): filtrands assayed for Muc2 mucin with Muc2-specific antibody labeled with HRP-tagged goat anti-rabbit second antibody. Since no assay gave the same quantitative amount of substance present as any other assay, results were normalized as a percentage of the maximal concentration for that assay, which consistently appeared shortly after addition of PGE2 in sample no. 6 in all assays and all experiments. In the lower panel, without HCO3, all maximum values were less than 60% of the maximum values in the upper panel with HCO3 for each type of assay. Thus, independent of the type of assay, the relative amounts of products were similar for all assays. All showed that released product was maximal after PGE2 stimulation.