Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Karen A. Fagan, Brian W. Fouty, Robert C. Tyler, Kenneth G. Morris Jr., Lisa K. Hepler, Koichi Sato, Timothy D. LeCras, Steven H. Abman, Howard D. Weinberger, Paul L. Huang, Ivan F. McMurtry, David M. Rodman
Published in Volume 103, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 1999; 103(2):291–299 doi:10.1172/JCI3862
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7

Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP; mean ± SEM) in wild-type (open bars), eNOS+/– (shaded bars) mice, and eNOS–/– (closed bars) mice exposed to inspired O2 equivalent to sea level, mild hypoxia, and severe hypoxia. There was a modest increase in RV systolic pressure in eNOS+/– and –/– mice compared with controls (*P = 0.01 for each) in normoxia, but they did not differ from one another (P = ns; n = 6, 9, and 5, respectively). After exposure to mild hypoxia, RV systolic pressure was similar in eNOS+/– and –/– mice (P = ns) and significantly higher than in wild-type mice (P < 0.001, n = 14, 5, and 8, respectively). After exposure to severe hypoxia, control mice (n = 8) had a significant increase in RV pressure (P < 0.001) compared with 5,280 ft. eNOS–/– mice had a small increase in RV pressure compared with 5,280 ft (P = 0.12, n = 7). eNOS+/– mice (n = 6) also had an increase in RV pressure (P < 0.01) compared with 5,280 ft after exposure to severe hypoxia. However, there was no difference between the mice after severe hypoxia.