Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Ken L. Chambliss, Qian Wu, Sarah Oltmann, Eddy S. Konaniah, Michihisa Umetani, Kenneth S. Korach, Gail D. Thomas, Chieko Mineo, Ivan S. Yuhanna, Sung Hoon Kim, Zeynep Madak-Erdogan, Adriana Maggi, Sean P. Dineen, Christina L. Roland, David Y. Hui, Rolf A. Brekken, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Benita S. Katzenellenbogen, Philip W. Shaul
Published in Volume 120, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(7):2319–2330 doi:10.1172/JCI38291
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7
Non-nuclear ER signaling does not induce a uterotrophic response or promote breast cancer tumor growth in vivo.

(A) Uteri from mice treated 24 days with vehicle, E2, dendrimer, or EDC. (B) Uterine wet weight/body weight ratio. In additional experiments, uteri were obtained from mice that were also treated with either ICI 182,780 (C) or pertussis toxin (D). In BD, values are mean ± SEM, n = 8–9. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle; P < 0.05 versus no ICI 182,780. (E) MCF-7 cell tumor xenografts were established with E2 treatment for 28 days in SCID mice, and treatment was then randomized to continue with E2 for 21 days or switched to vehicle, dendrimer, or EDC for 21 days. Representative tumors are shown in E. (F) Tumor weight at end of study. In F, values are mean ± SEM, n = 11–18. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle.