Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Constantin Rüder, Uta E. Höpken, Jana Wolf, Hans-Willi Mittrücker, Boris Engels, Bettina Erdmann, Susanne Wollenzin, Wolfgang Uckert, Bernd Dörken, Armin Rehm
Published in Volume 119, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(8):2184–2203 doi:10.1172/JCI37760
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Jci37760
Figure 9
EBAG9 interacts with γ2-adaptin in vitro.

(A) Jurkat cells (2 × 106) were transiently transfected with EBAG9-GFP and solubilized in Triton X-100–containing lysis buffer. Cell lysate was incubated with the indicated immobilized GST-fusion protein, and bound EBAG9-GFP was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with biotinylated anti-GFP antibody. An aliquot (1/6 volume of the reaction mixture) of the cell lysates was immunoblotted for expression of EBAG9-GFP (input). (B) The membrane proximal attachment domain (MA) alone (aa 8–27) and the coiled-coil domain (CC; aa 176–206) were dispensable for the interaction of EBAG9-GFP with the ear domain of γ2-adaptin. MDA-MB435 cells (2 × 106) transfected with EBAG9-GFP (WT) or deletion mutants (MA, ΔCC, ΔMA, ΔMAΔCC) were lysed in Triton X-100–containing lysis buffer, and GST pulldowns were performed as described in A. Input was 1/6 volume of the reaction mixture. To control for an equal loading of GST proteins, membranes were stained with Ponceau (input GST). At right is a schematic representation of EBAG9-GFP and its deletion mutants.