Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Qi Shen, Shawn C. Little, Meiqi Xu, Julia Haupt, Cindy Ast, Takenobu Katagiri, Stefan Mundlos, Petra Seemann, Frederick S. Kaplan, Mary C. Mullins, Eileen M. Shore
Published in Volume 119, Issue 11
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(11):3462–3472 doi:10.1172/JCI37412
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
ACVR1 mutation signaling requires the BMP/Smad signaling pathway.

(AD) Compared with uninjected embryos (A), wild-type embryos injected with 10 pg mutant R206H ACVR1 mRNA showed a range of ventralized phenotypes at 1 day after fertilization: weak (V1, B; and V2, C), moderate (V3, D), and strong (V4 and V5, examples shown in Figure 3, D and E). Scale bars: 0.2 mm. (EH) Compared with uninjected embryos (E), wild-type embryos injected with translation-blocking morpholinos (MO) against smad5 (F) showed strongly dorsalized phenotypes, evident by the characteristic elongated morphology at the 4-somite stage. When coinjected with smad5 MO, mutant ACVR1 (10 pg) does not induce ventralization (G). Scale bars: 0.2 mm. (H) Quantification of embryo injection results (uninjected, n = 82; mutant ACVR1 only, n = 289; smad5 MO only, n = 169; mutant ACVR1 plus smad5 MO, n = 202). (I) DM inhibits mutant ACVR1–induced ventralization. Wild-type embryos treated with DM (40 μM) become severely dorsalized (n = 54), whereas solvent alone has no effect (n = 42). Ventralization induced by 20 pg mutant ACVR1 mRNA (n = 79) is completely blocked by DM (n = 75).