Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Eirini P. Papapetrou, Damian Kovalovsky, Laurent Beloeil, Derek Sant’Angelo, Michel Sadelain
Published in Volume 119, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(1):157–168 doi:10.1172/JCI37216
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6
MREs driven by pol II do not cause derepression of a miRNA target.

(A) hEF1a-driven MREs did not deregulate a heterologous miRNA target. Left: MEL clones harboring DsRed reporters encoded by vectors R144 or R223 were generated. Upon induction of differentiation with hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA), miR-144 was upregulated, resulting in specific repression of DsRed tagged with the miR-144–specific MRE (R144), but not with control miR-223–specific MRE (R223). Right: Superinfection at high MOI of the same clones with a lentiviral vector encoding 4 copies of the miR-144–specific MRE tagged to GFP (G144) did not detectably alter DsRed repression (compare bottom overlays). Shown are the results of 3 independent induction experiments (induced 1–induced 3). Numbers in parentheses indicate mean fluorescence intensity of DsRed expression. (B) MREs driven by U6 promoter mediated derepression of the respective miRNA target. MEL clones harboring DsRed sensors regulated by either miR-144 or miR-451 (top left) were superinfected at high MOI with vectors harboring 4 copies of the respective MREs driven by the strong pol III U6 promoter (top right). Transduction with both vectors mediated derepression of DsRed targeted by the respective miRNA, from 2.3-fold to 1.7-fold in the case of the miR-144–specific MRE (left overlays) and from 2-fold to 1.4-fold in the case of the miR-451–specific MRE (right overlays). Numbers in parentheses indicate mean fluorescence intensity of DsRed expression. Fold DsRed repression is expressed as ratio of mean fluorescence intensities before and after induction.