Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Rajeev Aurora, Maureen J. Donlin, Nathan A. Cannon, John E. Tavis
Published in Volume 119, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(1):225–236 doi:10.1172/JCI37085
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5
Random shuffling of sequences causes loss of information in the response-specific networks.

We generated 10 independent alignments, in which 1a Marked sequences were randomly replaced with 1a Poor sequences at 3 levels of replacement: 2, 4, or 6 sequences, giving 12.5%, 25%, and 37.5% sequences shuffled, respectively. Shown are proportions of true positive covarying pairs relative to the unshuffled Marked sequences. P values showing significance of the differences in conserved edges relative to the unshuffled network were determined by Student’s t test.