Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Rajeev Aurora, Maureen J. Donlin, Nathan A. Cannon, John E. Tavis
Published in Volume 119, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(1):225–236 doi:10.1172/JCI37085
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
The connectivity of the response-specific covariance networks is different.

Shown are 1a Marked (A and B) and 1a Poor (C and D) response classes. (A and C) Networks formed by the covariant pairs of residue positions. The most highly connected nodes are in yellow. (B and D) Positions that directly covary with position 463 (square node) are shown to highlight the differences between the networks.