Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Victor N. Uebele, Anthony L. Gotter, Cindy E. Nuss, Richard L. Kraus, Scott M. Doran, Susan L. Garson, Duane R. Reiss, Yuxing Li, James C. Barrow, Thomas S. Reger, Zhi-Qiang Yang, Jeanine E. Ballard, Cuyue Tang, Joseph M. Metzger, Sheng-Ping Wang, Kenneth S. Koblan, John J. Renger
Published in Volume 119, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(6):1659–1667 doi:10.1172/JCI36954
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Cacna1g KO mice resist HFD-induced weight gain.

(A and B) Percent change in body weight relative to the start of HFD (A) and HFD consumption (B), measured every 24 or 12 hours as described in Results, for WT (filled squares, n = 8) and KO (open squares, n = 7) male littermates. #P < 0.05, *P < 0.01, §P < 0.001, WT versus KO; 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test. (C and D) Average individual activity, as assessed by telemetry transmitter movements summed over 30-minute intervals (C), and average core temperature (D) of WT (filled symbols) and KO (open symbols) animals. Average values for animals fed normal chow (triangles) and HFD (squares) are plotted on a 24-hour Zeitgeiber time scale, with lights-off periods indicated by black bars along the x axis. Gray bars above denote significant 30-minute time points (P < 0.05, mixed linear effects model for repeated measures). Data are mean ± SEM.