Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Pierre Sonveaux, Frédérique Végran, Thies Schroeder, Melanie C. Wergin, Julien Verrax, Zahid N. Rabbani, Christophe J. De Saedeleer, Kelly M. Kennedy, Caroline Diepart, Bénédicte F. Jordan, Michael J. Kelley, Bernard Gallez, Miriam L. Wahl, Olivier Feron, Mark W. Dewhirst
Published in Volume 118, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(12):3930–3942 doi:10.1172/JCI36843
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Metabolic characterization of oxidative SiHa and glycolytic WiDr tumor cell lines.

(A) pH of cell culture supernatants after reaching cell confluence on day 0 was measured with a pH meter. Inset shows typical dishes containing confluent WiDr and SiHa cells in phenol red–containing medium. **P = 0.0013 (2-way ANOVA; n = 3). (B) An equal amount (2 × 107 cells/ml) of viable SiHa and WiDr cells were placed in a sealed tube containing an EPR oxygen sensor. EPR measurements revealed a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the rate of oxygen consumption between SiHa and WiDr tumor cells (Student’s t test; n = 5–9). (C) At time 0, confluent cells received fresh medium containing glucose and FBS. Glucose utilization (solid lines, left y axis) and lactate concentration in the cell supernatant (dotted lines, right y axis) were determined enzymatically. Note the different scales of the left and right y axes. n = 4. Error bars represent the SEM and are sometimes smaller than symbols.