Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hyunsoo Kim, Han Kyoung Choi, Ji Hye Shin, Kyung Hee Kim, Ji Young Huh, Seung Ah Lee, Chang-Yong Ko, Han-Sung Kim, Hong-In Shin, Hwa Jeong Lee, Daewon Jeong, Nacksung Kim, Yongwon Choi, Soo Young Lee
Published in Volume 119, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(4):813–825 doi:10.1172/JCI36809
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Selection of a RANK inhibitor peptide and transduction of the peptide into BMMs and mature OCs.

(A) Schematic representation of RANK WT and its Mt (RANK Mt). (B) Osteoclastogenesis mediated by RANK WT (pMX–RANK WT) and RANK Mt (pMX–RANK Mt). BMMs were transduced with RANK WT or RANK Mt and stimulated with an anti-FLAG antibody (10 μg/ml). Transduced BMMs were stained for TRAP after 4 days. Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) Transduced BMMs were serum starved for 1 hour, stimulated with an anti-FLAG antibody for the indicated period, and analyzed by Western blotting with phospho-ERK, phospho-p38, phospho-JNK, and IκB antibodies. β-actin blots served as loading control. (D) Amino acid sequences of human and mouse RANK containing the IVVY motif. These conserved regions were chosen for the design of a RANK inhibitor peptide. (E) Structure of the RANK inhibitor peptide conjugated with FITC and Hph-1 protein–transduction domain. (F) Transduction of the RANK peptide into BMMs (left 3 columns) and mature OCs (right 3 columns). After 1 hour of incubation with the peptides, intracellular fluorescence was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bars: 10 μm (left); 100 μm (right).