Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Andrew A. Wilson, George J. Murphy, Hiroshi Hamakawa, Letty W. Kwok, Sreedevi Srinivasan, Avi-Hai Hovav, Richard C. Mulligan, Salomon Amar, Bela Suki, Darrell N. Kotton
Published in Volume 120, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(1):379–389 doi:10.1172/JCI36666
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6
Amelioration of elastase-induced emphysema in mice treated with EF1α-hAAT lentivirus.

(AD) Analysis of BAL cells and BAL fluid (BALF) from mice treated with EF1α-GFP versus EF1α-hAAT lentiviral vectors followed by intratracheal elastase. (A) In mice treated with EF1α-GFP lentiviral vector, the percentage of AMs in the BAL that expressed GFP is shown for each time point after elastase exposure. (B) hAAT protein levels in the BAL fluid of EF1α-hAAT–treated mice following elastase exposure. (C and D) Kinetics of macrophage recruitment (C) and neutrophil recruitment (D) following elastase exposure. Data are represented as means ± SEM. (E) Representative hematoxylin and eosin–stained lung sections from the indicated groups 21 days after elastase exposure. Scale bars: 100 μm. (FI) Comparison of lung compliance (C), equivalent alveolar diameter (Deq), heterogeneity (SD of Deq), and area-weighted mean alveolar diameter (D2), a parameter sensitive to changes in both airspace enlargement and its heterogeneity (28). (J) Structure-function relationship demonstrating that increases in D2 correlated with increases in C (r2=0.694). Note that there was no difference between the control groups of PBS-exposed mice treated with either GFP- or AAT-expressing vectors. The graph in J combines the data in F and I. Box plots in A, B, and FI illustrate median (horizontal line), 25th and 75th percentiles (upper and lower box boundaries), and highest and lowest observed values (whiskers). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).