Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Andrew A. Wilson, George J. Murphy, Hiroshi Hamakawa, Letty W. Kwok, Sreedevi Srinivasan, Avi-Hai Hovav, Richard C. Mulligan, Salomon Amar, Bela Suki, Darrell N. Kotton
Published in Volume 120, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(1):379–389 doi:10.1172/JCI36666
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Analysis of AMs obtained by BAL after lentiviral transduction.

(A) Flow cytometry of BAL cells obtained after transduction with CMV-GFP lentivirus showed that the majority of BAL cells were live (PI negative). (BD) Representative dot plots of live (PI-negative) BAL cells showing the percentage of cells expressing the GFP reporter gene 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years after instillation of the CMV-GFP lentiviral vector. (E) Typical forward/side scatter flow cytometry profile of mouse BAL cells, with more than 90% of cells located within an AM gate. (F) Gating on only GFP+ BAL cells illustrating that more than 99% of GFP-expressing cells 6 weeks after transduction were located within the AM forward/side scatter gate. (G) Purification of GFP+ BAL cells by flow cytometry for cytospin analysis. GFP+ cells exhibited the characteristic Wright-Giemsa staining appearance of AMs. Original magnification, ×63. (H) Flow cytometry histogram illustrating that GFP+ BAL cells expressed the macrophage marker F4/80 (black line overlay indicates isotype control staining). (I) Titering experiment illustrating transduction efficiency (percentage of GFP+ cells) of AMs obtained by BAL 6 weeks after instillation of the indicated quantity of CMV-GFP lentiviral particles. Each data point represents an individual mouse. Horizontal bars indicate the mean for each group. In AF, the numbers within the plots denote the percentage of cells in the respective gated portion of the plot. A complete flow cytometry gating algorithm to identify live BAL AMs is provided in Supplemental Figure 2.