Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Stefan Bröer, Charles G. Bailey, Sonja Kowalczuk, Cynthia Ng, Jessica M. Vanslambrouck, Helen Rodgers, Christiane Auray-Blais, Juleen A. Cavanaugh, Angelika Bröer, John E.J. Rasko
Published in Volume 118, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(12):3881–3892 doi:10.1172/JCI36625
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 9
Prediction of the renal phenotype from the genotype.

The results of in vivo urine analysis and in vitro transport experiments were combined to estimate the contribution of SLC6A19, SLC6A18, SLC6A20, and SLC36A2 to proline and glycine reabsorption in the kidney. Reabsorption capacity above 100% would manifest as a normal urinary phenotype. The urine phenotype is indicated below the subject as normal (NM), HG, or IG. The following formula was used to estimate proline and glycine reabsorption: (activity of allele 1 + activity of allele 2)/2 × contribution of SLC36A2 + (activity of allele 1 + activity of allele 2)/2 × contribution of SLC6A18 + (activity of allele 1 + activity of allele 2)/2 × contribution of SLC6A19 + (activity of allele 1 + activity of allele 2)/2 × contribution of SLC6A20. The following contributions to proline transport were used: SLC36A2 (60 AU); SLC6A18 (0 AU, not a substrate); SLC6A19 (40 AU); SLC6A20 (40 AU). The following contributions to glycine transport were used: SLC36A2 (40 AU); SLC6A18 (10 AU); SLC6A19 (60 AU); SLC6A20 (0 AU, not a substrate). The activity of individual alleles was calculated as a fraction of 1, reflecting the activity of the mutant compared with the WT when expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The algorithm correctly replicates the urinary phenotype of 25 of the 28 individuals.