Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Stefan Bröer, Charles G. Bailey, Sonja Kowalczuk, Cynthia Ng, Jessica M. Vanslambrouck, Helen Rodgers, Christiane Auray-Blais, Juleen A. Cavanaugh, Angelika Bröer, John E.J. Rasko
Published in Volume 118, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(12):3881–3892 doi:10.1172/JCI36625
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
Transport activity of mutant proline and glycine transporters.

Oocytes were injected with WT or mutant cRNA encoding the proton amino acid transporter SLC36A2, the imino acid transporter SLC6A20, or the putative glycine transporter SLC6A18. (A) After incubation for 3 days (SLC36A2 WT and its mutant G87V) or 4 days (SLC6A18 and SLC6A20 WT and its mutant T199M), uptake of glycine and proline was measured. Each bar represents the mean ± SD uptake activity of 10 oocytes. The experiment was repeated 3 times, with equivalent results. (B) Concentration dependence of proline-induced inward currents (Ipro) induced in SLC36A2-expressing oocytes. Currents mediated by the G87V mutant are shown relative to the currents induced in WT transporter–expressing oocytes. Each data point represents the mean ± SD transport activity of n = 7 oocytes. (C) Concentration dependence of glycine-induced inward currents in SLC36A2-expressing oocytes (n = 7 experiments). Surface expression of eGFP-transporter fusions of WT (D) and G87V mutant (E) SLC36A2 in Xenopus laevis oocytes in comparison to noninjected oocytes (F).