Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yi Lai, Gail D. Thomas, Yongping Yue, Hsiao T. Yang, Dejia Li, Chun Long, Luke Judge, Brian Bostick, Jeffrey S. Chamberlain, Ronald L. Terjung, Dongsheng Duan
Published in Volume 119, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(3):624–635 doi:10.1172/JCI36612
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Sarcolemmal nNOS localization depends on the rod, but not the C-terminal, domain of dystrophin.

(A) Schematic outline of the full-length and synthetic dystrophin constructs. “Yes” indicates that nNOS is recruited to the sarcolemma by the construct; “No” indicates that the construct cannot restore nNOS to the sarcolemma. Dotted boxes denote deleted regions. (B) The DH2–R15 minidystrophin anchors nNOS to the sarcolemma. Representative photomicrographs of dystrophin immunostaining, nNOS activity staining, and nNOS immunostaining in the DH2–R15 minigene plasmid–transfected mdx muscle. Dystrophin was revealed by epitope-specific antibodies (H1, R11, R16, R17, R18, and H3). The H1 antibody only recognizes human dystrophin (Hum Dys). Other dystrophin antibodies recognize both human and mouse dystrophin. Asterisks indicate a minigene-transfected myofiber; arrows, revertant myofibers. Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Sarcolemmal nNOS localization does not require the C-terminal domain, nor is it dependent on the repeats adjacent to R16/17. Representative photomicrographs of human dystrophin/nNOS double immunostaining and nNOS activity staining on serial sections from the DH2–R15/DR18–19, DH2–R15/DC, and DR3–15/DR18–23/DC plasmid–transfected mdx muscles. Asterisks indicate dystrophin plasmid–transfected fibers; crosses, revertant myofibers. Scale bar: 50 μm.