Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kevin R. Novak, Paul Nardelli, Tim C. Cope, Gregory Filatov, Jonathan D. Glass, Jaffar Khan, Mark M. Rich
Published in Volume 119, Issue 5
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(5):1150–1158 doi:10.1172/JCI36570
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5
The effect of shifting the voltage dependence of sodium channel inactivation on action potentials triggered by both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current injection.

The black curve represents the hypothetical voltage dependence of sodium channel inactivation in an axon from an untreated rat. The sodium channel inactivation curve (gray) for an axon with reduced excitability from a septic rat is shifted to the left. In the septic axon, at a resting potential of –55 mV, only 30% of sodium channels are available to participate in generating an action potential. In the normal axon, at the same resting potential, 80% of sodium channels are available. The difference in percentage of sodium channels available leads to a small action potential in the axon from the septic rat (Rheobase AP, gray curve) and a large action potential in the normal axon (Rheobase AP, black curve). An anode break pulse hyperpolarizes each axon by 5 mV. In the axon from the septic rat, the resting potential is on the steep part of the inactivation curve, so a 5-mV hyperpolarization causes substantial relief of sodium channel inactivation and a large increase in action potential amplitude (Anode break AP, gray curve). In the normal axon, the resting potential is on the shallow part of the curve, so a 5 mV hyperpolarization does not greatly relieve inactivation and causes only a small increase in action potential amplitude (Anode break AP, black curve).