Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Michele M. Hickey, Theresa Richardson, Tao Wang, Matias Mosqueira, Evguenia Arguiri, Hongwei Yu, Qian-Chun Yu, Charalambos C. Solomides, Edward E. Morrisey, Tejvir S. Khurana, Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou, M. Celeste Simon
Published in Volume 120, Issue 3
J Clin Invest. 2010; 120(3):827–839 doi:10.1172/JCI36362
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 8
Some, but not all, VhlR/R pulmonary phenotypes, are dependent on HIF-2α activity.

(A) Representative lung images from each genotype suggest that neither Hif1a nor Hif2a heterozygosity completely restored WT pulmonary architecture (Masson’s trichrome staining). (B) Hydroxyproline content was decreased in both VhlR/R Hif1a+/– and VhlR/RHif2a+/– lungs compared with VhlR/R (n = 4–6 per genotype, *P < 0.02 compared with WT controls). (C) Macrophage infiltration was not significantly affected in either VhlR/R Hif1a+/– or VhlR/RHif2a+/– lungs (n = 5, **P < 0.007 compared with WT). (D) In contrast, only Hif2a heterozygosity resulted in a partial rescue of the hemorrhage phenotype, as quantitated by hemosiderin staining (n = 5–7, *P < 0.01 compared with WT controls). (E and F) Similarly, the number of cells in BAL from VhlR/RHif2a+/– lungs was restored to near WT levels, suggesting a rescue of edema (E, n = 5, *P < 0.05 compared with VhlR/R lungs). There was also a trend toward decreased BAL protein concentration in VhlR/RHif2a+/– lungs (F, n = 5, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.003 as compared with WT lungs). Scale bars: 20 μm.