Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Virna Cortez-Retamozo, Filip K. Swirski, Peter Waterman, Hushan Yuan, Jose Luiz Figueiredo, Andita P. Newton, Rabi Upadhyay, Claudio Vinegoni, Rainer Kohler, Joseph Blois, Adam Smith, Matthias Nahrendorf, Lee Josephson, Ralph Weissleder, Mikael J. Pittet
Published in Volume 118, Issue 12
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(12):4058–4066 doi:10.1172/JCI36335
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Jci0836335
Figure 5
In vivo NIRF bronchoscopy for detection of treatment response.

(A) Schematic representation of the airways and features of imaging modalities. FMT resolves signals coming from the entire organ, whereas NIRF fiberoptic bronchoscopy resolves signals coming mostly from the conducting airways. Imaging resolutions are 1 mm and 15 μm for FMT and bronchoscopy, respectively. (B and C) Microcatheter-based NIRF bronchoscopy quantitatively informed on MMP activity within bronchi of mice sensitized and challenged with OVA. (B) Third-order branches are shown. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) The signal was dramatically reduced in mice administered dexamethasone (orange) or the self-activating viridin prodrug (green) compared with mice administered vehicle dextran only (red). Unchallenged mice (blue) served as controls. (D) In vivo MMP activity detected by NIRF bronchoscopy positively correlated with the number of eosinophils in BAL fluids (r2= 0.79). At least 2 independent experiments were performed, with n = 3–5 per experiment and per group. Data are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus OVA-challenged, vehicle dextran–treated control.