Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Katharina Eikermann-Haerter, Ergin Dileköz, Chiho Kudo, Sean I. Savitz, Christian Waeber, Michael J. Baum, Michel D. Ferrari, Arn M.J.M. van den Maagdenberg, Michael A. Moskowitz, Cenk Ayata
Published in Volume 119, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2009; 119(1):99–109 doi:10.1172/JCI36059
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
The recovery of whisker pad stimulation–evoked cortical field potentials.

(A) Representative tracings showing field potentials in a female WT (top), homozygous female R192Q mutant (middle), and heterozygous female S218L mutant mouse (bottom), evoked by electrical stimulation of the whisker pad (black triangles) and recorded from the whisker barrel field using extracellular glass micropipettes (400 μm depth, layer IV). Evoked potentials ranging from 2 to 4 mV in amplitude at baseline (column a) were abolished upon arrival of SD at the recording site (column b) and gradually recovered within less than 10 minutes (columns c–e), as shown in the time course graph in B. Calibration bars: vertical, 1 mV; horizontal, 20 ms. (B) The time course of recovery of somatosensory evoked field potentials (SSEP) after a single SD (time 0).The AUC for each evoked field potential (mV • ms) was expressed as percent of pre-SD baseline. The rate of recovery of cortical evoked field potentials did not differ among WT and FHM1 mutant mice. Recovery of peak amplitudes also did not differ among groups (data not shown). Numbers of mice are indicated in the graph. Male and female WT mice did not differ; therefore, pooled data are shown. Error bars were omitted for clarity.