Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Sara E. Pinney, Courtney MacMullen, Susan Becker, Yu-Wen Lin, Cheryl Hanna, Paul Thornton, Arupa Ganguly, Show-Ling Shyng, Charles A. Stanley
Published in Volume 118, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(8):2877–2886 doi:10.1172/JCI35414
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Analysis of mutant channels expressed in COSm6 cells.

(A) Western blot analysis of fSUR1. In cells coexpressing Kir6.2 and S1386P-fSUR1, 2 bands were observed, the lower core-glycosylated band (black arrow) and the upper complex-glycosylated band (white arrow), as was seen with WT-fSUR1. (B) Confocal images of cells coexpressing Kir6.2 and either WT-fSUR1 or S1386P-fSUR1 and immunostained for surface SUR1. A and B illustrate that dominant KATP mutant proteins are processed and trafficked to the membrane like the WT protein. (C and D) Representative inside-out patch-clamp recordings of WT, S1386P mutant, or WT + S1386P channels showing channel response to MgADP (C) or diazoxide (D). Currents were measured at –50 mV in symmetrical K-INT solution, and inward currents are shown as upward deflections. Patches were exposed to ATP, ADP, or diazoxide, as indicated by the bars above the records (the patch was also exposed to 1 mM ATP at the very beginning and end of each recording). Free Mg2+ concentration was maintained at 1 mM in all ATP-containing solutions. Compared with WT channels, S1386P mutant channels showed a lack of response to MgADP and diazoxide, while channels from simulated heterozygous expression (WT + S1386P) showed a partial response. (E) Quantification of MgADP and diazoxide responses. Currents in 0.1 mM ATP, 0.1 mM ATP + 0.5 mM ADP, or 0.1 mM ATP + 0.2 mM diazoxide were normalized to that seen in K-INT and expressed as percentage of currents. Each bar represents mean ± SEM of 11 (WT) or 7 (S1386P and WT + S1386P) patches.