Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
David A. Stoltz, Egon A. Ozer, Peter J. Taft, Marilyn Barry, Lei Liu, Peter J. Kiss, Thomas O. Moninger, Matthew R. Parsek, Joseph Zabner
Published in Volume 118, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(9):3123–3131 doi:10.1172/JCI35147
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 1
Quorum-sensing–dependent P. aeruginosa infection of Drosophila.

(A and B) Scanning electron micrographs at low and high magnification of Drosophila at 24 hours following infection with wild-type P. aeruginosa (PAO1). (A) Low-magnification image shows a whole fly with an opening in the distal abdomen. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. (B) High-magnification image of boxed area on whole fly. Arrow indicates bacteria and asterisk denotes extracellular matrix. Scale bar: 2.5 μm. (C and D) GFP signal (quorum-sensing activity) after infection of Drosophila with a quorum-sensing reporter strain of P. aeruginosa (under control of the lasB promoter). GFP signal at 0 hours (C) and 18 hours (D) following abdominal inoculation with PAO1. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. (E) Fly survival after infection with PAO1 and quorum-sensing–deficient strains of P. aeruginosa. da-GAL4/+ flies were infected with PAO1 (squares), ΔlasI/rhlI (circles), or ΔlasR/rhlR (triangles) strains. n = 30 flies per group for each experiment. *P < 0.001, comparing PAO1 versus ΔlasI/rhlI and PAO1 versus ΔlasR/rhlR fly survival; log-rank test. (F) P. aeruginosa bacterial counts after infection with PAO1 or ΔlasI/rhlI. At 6, 12, and 18 hours following infection, flies were anesthetized, surface sterilized, and homogenized for performance of quantitative bacterial counts. Data are displayed as log10 CFU/fly and represent the mean ± SEM. n = 3–5 per time point with 10–20 flies per group per experiment.