Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Lisiane B. Meira, James M. Bugni, Stephanie L. Green, Chung-Wei Lee, Bo Pang, Diana Borenshtein, Barry H. Rickman, Arlin B. Rogers, Catherine A. Moroski-Erkul, Jose L. McFaline, David B. Schauer, Peter C. Dedon, James G. Fox, Leona D. Samson
Published in Volume 118, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(7):2516–2525 doi:10.1172/JCI35073
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
Aag–/– animals are more susceptible than Aag+/+ animals to DSS-induced colitis.

(A) Change in colon length. (B) Spleen weight as a percentage of body weight. AOM+DSS Aag+/+, n = 14; AOM+DSS Aag–/–, n = 31; AOM Aag+/+, n = 15; AOM Aag–/–, n = 19; DSS Aag+/+, n = 10; DSS Aag–/–, n = 10. Data are mean ± SD. (C) Histopathology scores for severity of inflammation, epithelial defects, and crypt atrophy. A description of the histopathological endpoints for inflammation examined can be found in Supplemental Methods. Epithelial defect scores were based on increased gland dilation and surface epithelial attenuation. (D) Photomicrographs showing a DSS-treated Aag+/+ colon bearing a lesion with an average epithelial defect score (left) and a DSS-treated Aag–/– colon bearing a lesion with an average epithelial defect score (right). Scale bars: 100 μm.