Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hyung J. Chun, Ziad A. Ali, Yoko Kojima, Ramendra K. Kundu, Ahmad Y. Sheikh, Rani Agrawal, Lixin Zheng, Nicholas J. Leeper, Nathan E. Pearl, Andrew J. Patterson, Joshua P. Anderson, Philip S. Tsao, Michael J. Lenardo, Euan A. Ashley, Thomas Quertermous
Published in Volume 118, Issue 10
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(10):3343–3354 doi:10.1172/JCI34871
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6
AT1R and APJ receptors form heterodimer complexes.

(A) Immunoprecipitation using α-GFP antibody, followed by Western blot with α-HA antibody to detect APJ demonstrated a physical association between the 2 receptors. In the bottom panel control blot, the filled circle identifies AT1R-GFP and the triangle represents GFP. The band present in both lanes is the immunoprecipitating antibody detected by the secondary antibody. Numbers on the right reflect weights of protein standards in kDa. The lanes are from the same gel that were noncontiguous. (B) FRET analysis was performed with HEK293 cells cotransfected with APJ and AT1R expression constructs, with coding regions fused to either CFP or YFP. Specific interaction between APJ and AT1R is shown by increased FRET signal (blue curve) but not between either of these receptors and the Fas receptor (red curve). (C) Immunoprecipitation of AT1R-GFP and blotting of APJ-HA was employed to show increased association in the presence of Ang II at 1 hour and even greater association at 6 hours. Coadministration of apelin resulted in a modest increase in association compared with Ang II alone at 6 hours. A13, apelin-13. (D) FRET analysis showed an increase in AT1R and APJ association when cells were stimulated with Ang II. Addition of apelin led to a modest increase in FRET signal in cells treated with apelin alone compared with unstimulated cells and Ang II plus apelin–treated cells compared with cells treated with Ang II alone.