Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kai Kessenbrock, Leopold Fröhlich, Michael Sixt, Tim Lämmermann, Heiko Pfister, Andrew Bateman, Azzaq Belaaouaj, Johannes Ring, Markus Ollert, Reinhard Fässler, Dieter E. Jenne
Published in Volume 118, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(7):2438–2447 doi:10.1172/JCI34694
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
PR3 and NE are not principally required for neutrophil extravasation and interstitial migration.

(A and B) Phorbol ester–treated ear tissues of WT and Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– mice were immunostained for laminin (LN; green) to visualize EBM and Gr-1 (red) to identify neutrophils. Lesions were examined 4 h after stimulus application by fluorescence microscopy as described in Methods. (A) Representative images of tissue from WT and Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– mice. Both genotypes developed strong and widespread neutrophil infiltrations. (B) Higher-magnification images of boxed regions in A. Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– neutrophils showed no retention at the EBM. Scale bars: 200 μm (A); 25 μm (B). (C) Overall neutrophil infiltrates were quantified as the percentage of Gr-1–positive cells per microscopic field. Data are mean ± SEM. Intravascular cells were excluded. No significant difference between WT and Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– mice was found (P = 0.63). In vitro migration of WT and Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– neutrophils directed by C5a through 3-dimensional collagen matrices was analyzed by time-lapse video microscopy (see Supplemental Video 1). (D) The tracks of WT (n = 41) and Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– (n = 42) neutrophils are shown, and the factor for directionality ± SEM is indicated. No impairment was observed regarding chemotactic directionality of Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– versus WT neutrophils (P = 0.19). (E) Velocities of single cells (individual points) were calculated and averaged (red bar). Prtn3–/–Ela2–/– neutrophils showed no significant difference versus WT cells (P = 0.30).