Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kory J. Lavine, Attila Kovacs, David M. Ornitz
Published in Volume 118, Issue 7
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(7):2404–2414 doi:10.1172/JCI34561
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 8
Endogenous HH signaling is required for survival of the border zone vasculature.

(A and B) PECAM staining of the border zone of control (A) and SHH Ab–treated (B) hearts 4 days after MI, demonstrating that SHH Ab–treated animals have diminished border zone vasculature compared with controls. Original magnification, ×100. (C) Quantitation of blood vessel number/×100 field reveals that compared with controls (Cont), SHH Ab–treated hearts contain a statistically significant decrease in the number of blood vessels located within the border zone at days 4 and 14 after MI (*P < 0.01). (D and E) Hypoxyprobe staining revealing increased hypoxic tissue in the border zone of SHH Ab–treated hearts (E) compared with controls (D). (F and G) TUNEL staining demonstrating that SHH Ab–treated hearts (G) have increased border zone cell death of cardiomyocytes (arrows) compared with controls (F). (HK) Immunofluorescence staining for VEGF-A (H and I) and β-galactosidase (J and K) in control (H and J) and SHH Ab–treated (I and K) PTC1-LacZ hearts, revealing that SHH Ab treatment leads to reduced VEGF-A and PTC1 border zone expression. Dashed lines indicate the border of the infarct. Original magnification: ×200 (DG); ×400 (HK).