Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Karyn M. Austin, Mohan L. Gupta, Scott A. Coats, Asmin Tulpule, Gustavo Mostoslavsky, Alejandro B. Balazs, Richard C. Mulligan, George Daley, David Pellman, Akiko Shimamura
Published in Volume 118, Issue 4
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(4):1511–1518 doi:10.1172/JCI33764
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 2
SBDS localizes to a region corresponding to that of the mitotic spindle.

(A) SBDS colocalizes with the spindle by immunofluorescence. Primary BMSCs in metaphase (upper 2 panels) or in interphase (lower 2 panels) from normal control or SBDS–/– patients were fixed and stained with antibodies against SBDS (green), α-tubulin (red), and DAPI (blue). SBDS spindle staining was not detectable in any of the 6 SDS patients exhibiting low SBDS protein expression as analyzed by western blot. (B) The spindle-staining pattern is SBDS dependent. DF259 primary BMSCs were infected with a retroviral vector carrying SBDS cDNA or an empty vector control, as indicated. Cells were lysed or fixed for immunofluorescence studies 48–72 h after infection. Western blot analysis for SBDS expression is shown on the right. Tubulin was stained to control for equal sample loading. Fixed cells were stained for SBDS (green), α-tubulin (red), or DAPI (blue) and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. (C) Loss of SBDS abrogates the spindle-staining pattern. GM00038 skin fibroblasts were infected with lentiviral siRNA vectors against either SBDS or a LUC control and analyzed by immunofluorescence for SBDS (green).