Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kristina E. Hoot, Jessyka Lighthall, Gangwen Han, Shi-Long Lu, Allen Li, Wenjun Ju, Molly Kulesz-Martin, Erwin Bottinger, Xiao-Jing Wang
Published in Volume 118, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(8):2722–2732 doi:10.1172/JCI33713
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 7
Increased Smad3/Smad4-mediated Snail transcription contributes to Smad2 loss–associated Snail overexpression.

(A and B) Comparative PCR from chromatin immunoprecipitation (IP) showed an increase in Smad4 binding to the Snail promoter in Smad2–/– skin compared with WT skin. Residue Smad2 binding in Smad2–/– skin was from nonkeratinocyte population of the whole skin. Smad3 binding to the Snail promoter was not significantly changed in Smad2–/– skin in comparison with WT skin. Smad4 binding to the Snail promoter was significantly increased in Smad2–/– skin. *P < 0.05. (C) Dual knockdown of Smad2 and Smad3 or Smad2 and Smad4 abrogated Smad2 loss–associated Snail overexpression. Smad2 knockdown (48 hours) caused a significant increase in Snail expression. Knockdown of Smad4 alone caused a reduction in Snail expression. Concomitant knockdown of Smad2 and Smad3 or Smad2 and Smad4 reduced Snail expression back to mock-transfection levels. P < 0.05 compared with mock transfection. P < 0.05 compared with Smad2 siRNA treatment.