Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Kristina E. Hoot, Jessyka Lighthall, Gangwen Han, Shi-Long Lu, Allen Li, Wenjun Ju, Molly Kulesz-Martin, Erwin Bottinger, Xiao-Jing Wang
Published in Volume 118, Issue 8
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(8):2722–2732 doi:10.1172/JCI33713
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 4
Altered gene expression associated with dedifferentiation and EMT in K5.Smad2–/– papillomas and epidermis.

(A) Upregulated mRNA expression of K8- and EMT-associated molecules in K5.Smad2–/– papillomas. *P < 0.05 compared with Smad2+/+ papillomas. (B) Downregulation of E-cadherin in K5.Smad2–/– papillomas. All changes in Smad2–/– papillomas are statistically significant in comparison with Smad2+/+ papillomas. *P < 0.05 compared with Smad2+/+ papillomas. (C) Upregulation of Snail and Slug mRNA in K5.Smad2–/– epidermis. P < 0.01 compared with WT skin. (D) Downregulation of E-cadherin in K5.Smad2–/– epidermis. P < 0.01 compared with WT skin. (E) Snail expression levels after knocking down individual Smads in HaCaT cells. #P < 0.05 compared with mock transfection treatment with TGF-β1. **P < 0.001 compared with mock transfection with TGF-β1 treatment. ††P < 0.001 compared with mock transfection without TGF-β1. P < 0.05 compared with mock transfection without TGF-β1 (F) Slug expression levels after knocking down individual Smads in HaCaT cells. P < 0.05 compared with mock transfection without TGF-β1.