Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Hewang Li, Ines Armando, Peiying Yu, Crisanto Escano, Susette C. Mueller, Laureano Asico, Annabelle Pascua, Quansheng Lu, Xiaoyan Wang, Van Anthony M. Villar, John E. Jones, Zheng Wang, Ammasi Periasamy, Yuen-Sum Lau, Patricio Soares-da-Silva, Karen Creswell, Gaétan Guillemette, David R. Sibley, Gilbert Eisner, Robin A. Felder, Pedro A. Jose
Published in Volume 118, Issue 6
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(6):2180–2189 doi:10.1172/JCI33637
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
Effect of D5R stimulation on the expression of the glycosylated form of the AT1R protein.

(A) AT1R/D5R HEK293 cells were incubated with Fen (1 μM) for the indicated times; total cell lysates were electrophoretically separated, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with anti-GFP (band a, ~100–120 kDa; band b, ~65–85 kDa) to detect AT1R protein expression. Immunoblotting for actin was used to monitor the sample protein loading. n = 3. *P < 0.05 versus 0 min, ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test. (B) Protein samples (50 μg) from AT1R/D5R HEK293 cells were incubated with 10 mU PNGase F at 37°C for the indicated times, electrophoretically separated, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with anti-GFP antibody. Band S is sensitive to PNGase F and corresponds to the glycosylated form of the AT1R (band a). Band R is resistant to PNGase F and corresponds to the nonglycosylated form of the AT1R (band b). The ratio of band S intensity to band R intensity was determined by densitometry in 3 separate experiments. n = 3. *P < 0.05 versus 0 h, ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test. Data are mean ± SEM.