Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Yuka Ichikawa-Shindo, Takayuki Sakurai, Akiko Kamiyoshi, Hisaka Kawate, Nobuyoshi Iinuma, Takahiro Yoshizawa, Teruhide Koyama, Junichi Fukuchi, Satoshi Iimuro, Nobuo Moriyama, Hayato Kawakami, Toshinori Murata, Kenji Kangawa, Ryozo Nagai, Takayuki Shindo
Published in Volume 118, Issue 1
J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(1):29–39 doi:10.1172/JCI33022
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 6
In vivo vascular permeability assay.

(A) Footpad edema model. λ-Carrageenan was injected into the footpad of 8-week-old RAMP2+/– and WT mice to induce edema for the evaluation of vascular permeability in adult mice; swelling of the footpad was measured hourly using a thickness gauge. RAMP2+/– mice showed significantly greater swelling than WT mice. n = 12 per group. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 vs. WT. (B) Skin edema model (see Methods). Fluorescence intensity was measured using a fluorescence microplate reader. Permeability levels are presented relative to WT. RAMP2+/– mice (n = 8) showed significantly greater vascular permeability than WT mice (n = 13). **P < 0.01 vs. WT. (C) Brain edema model (see Methods). Vascular permeability in RAMP2+/– mice (n = 12) is presented relative to that in WT mice (n = 10). RAMP2+/– mice showed significantly greater vascular permeability than WT mice. *P < 0.05 vs. WT.